- - - - -


Sunday Morning Quarterback

Sunday Morning Quarterback

Tuesday, December 13, 2005

STAT RELEVANCE WATCH, PART THREE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
There are, as they say, lies, damn lies, and statistics. The numbers mean something, yet often we know not what. Here SMQ will look at the final regular season statistics in seven major categories, who succeeded in what, and how those statistics correlated to overall success in terms of final record. SMQ does have a full-time job and does not have a high-powered supercomputer - or even, at the moment, "basic" spreadsheet technology - but his analysis will be driven as deep as his egghead, tinfoil cap curiosity and cell phone calculator will take it. That is to say, quasi-scientific at best.

PART THREE: In which categories did the best team excel? (Read Part One and Part Two)

Method: To determine which numbers have the highest correlation to success, it's wise to look at the best teams and in which categories they tended to excel. SMQ took the top 25 (from his own poll, which does not substantially differ from any of the Official Do Not Disturb polls) and averaged each team's finish in each of the seven major non-scoring statistical categories - rushing offense, passing offense, total offense, rushing defense, pass efficiency defense, total defense and turnover margin - into an average ranking for the top 25 as a whole in each category.

Top 25 - Average Rank Per Category
Rushing Defense: 25.5
Total Defense: 25.6
Pass Efficiency Defense: 27.1
Rushing Offense: 35.9
Turnover Margin: 36.4
Total Offense: 38.1
Passing Offense: 47.9

Clearly, the defensive categories come out way ahead; among the top 25, there were a number of teams with better offensive numbers than defensive - Southern Cal, Texas, Texas Tech, Louisville, Iowa, Oregon, UCLA, Wisconsin - but those eight prove to be the exception to the rather overwhelming general trend (two-thirds of the final poll) of success via defensive prowess. And in the case of USC, Louisville and especially Tecas, the defensive numbers are pretty good, too.

The tendency of good teams exhibiting more defensive success becomes even more pronounced among the top ten:

Top 10 - Average Rank Per Category
Total Defense: 15.9
Rushing Defense: 16.3
Pass Efficiency Defense: 18.7
Rushing Offense: 31.7
Total Offense: 34.4
Turnover Margin: 34.4
Passing Offense: 49.1

Eight of the top ten finished in the top 17 in total defense; only three managed the feat on offense. Only USC, Texas and Notre Dame have better overall offensive rankings than defensive in this elite group, and again, the Trojans' and Longhorns' defenses finished 39th and sixth, respectively.

The top ten also features substantial offensive mediocrity in the form of Virginia Tech (56th), Georgia (55th), LSU (64th) and Miami (61st). On the other hand, only one top ten team, Notre Dame, had a unit even sniffing the bottom half of the defensive stats (64th).

SMQ began this simple study open-minded, with no preconceived hypotheses in any direction. But combined with the tepid conclusion of Part One (top teams in each defensive category had better aggregate records than the top teams in any offensive category) and Part Two (most teams can overcome a weakness in one offensive category more successfully than they can a weakness on defense or in turnover margin), the results are significant in favor of winning with defense.

Of course, this is only a trend, and not a rule. SMQ looked only at one season's results. A for-real scientist would note that, while there is a correlation between defense and success, there is no causation; maybe the defenses are good because the team is winning (teams coming from behind - usually inferior teams - tend to be one-dimensional, etc.). Conversely, offenses may become more conservative when a team is in front and sacrifice stats for ball control and maintaining the lead. There was no effort to account for strength of schedule differences - though all but a couple of the top statistical teams hail from power conferences. It's only logical that a team has to be good in a variety of different elements to be very successful; look at USC and Texas. Part Two showed that the teams with the best all-around statistical performance, on both sides, also tended to be the teams with the best won-loss records, which no single stat category can claim without also noting a few exceptions.

But the correlation is consistent and strong: offense is great, but a team's chances of winning - in 2005, at least - go up significantly higher in relation to the strength of its defense.

Got a gripe with SMQ's methods? Let him hear it below.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Permalink

9:36 PM

Comments: Post a Comment
Powered by Blogger

 

WELCOME...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
And don't let the name fool ya - second guessing the phenomenal athletic feats and split-second decisions of college kids under extreme physical duress is for every day of the week.


AWWW!! The totally nicest people, like, ever!...

How much football does he watch? Dude's got insights on -everybody-, and by everybody, I mean everybody. Throw in some of the best writing in the blogosphere, and we're talking about a daily must-read.
- Burnt Orange Nation

SMQ starts to sound more and more like the Gregg Easterbrook of our ideal memories every day - whip-smart, systematic, omnivorous in his intellectual tastes and yet unafraid of the cheap joke.
- Every Day Should Be Saturday

Sunday Morning Quarterback is one of our favorite football blogs on the internet.
- State Fans Nation

Sunday Morning Quarterback is a killer football blog if you are a college football junkie. It is run by one of the most thoughtful, intelligent, and analytical writers in the college football blogosphere...The guy is thorough and detailed and provides a level of analysis you are not going to find anywhere else .
- Bruins Nation

Just another hack writer who hasn't done one lick of research... - SOT2

...the pride of Southern Mississippi ever since Brett Favre turned into an ESPN soap opera, has the sort of prose knack that can keep you riveted to a preview about any one of D-IA's scrubbier members ... should be given gifts.
- MGoBlog

- - - - -
e-mail Sunday Morning Quarterback at sundaymorningqb@yahoo.com

- - - - -
PREVIOUSLY FROM SMQ:

2006 Preview
Anatomy of an Underdog
BlogPoll: 1-10/11-25/Roundtable
The ACC
The Big Ten
The Big XII
The Sun Belt

Running Departments
The Rap Sheet
July 29/Aug. 1/Aug. 9/Aug. 16/Aug.19/Aug. 25/Sept. 28/Oct. 4/Oct. 5/Oct. 18/Oct. 26/Nov. 2/Nov. 7/Nov. 8/Nov. 28/Dec. 2/Dec. 8/ Dec. 11/Dec. 18/Dec. 21/Feb. 6/Feb. 10/April 7/April 14/April 21/April 29/May 6/May 12/May 19/May 26/June 2/June 10/June 16/June 24/June 30/July 8/Aug. 4

- - - - -
SMQ-APPROVED
COLLEGE FOOTBALL PAGES

News from the Big Guys
ESPN/ College Football News Wire
Sports Illustrated
FOX
CBS Sportsline
USA Today
Opinion: Columnists and bloggers
Around the Oval (Ohio State)
Badger Sports (Wisconsin)
The Blue-Gray Sky (Notre Dame)
Block U (Utah)
BoiFromTroy (Southern Cal)
Bruins Nation (UCLA)
Burnt Orange Nation (Texas)
The Corporate Headquarters of the San Antonio Gunslingers
Dave Sez (Virginia)
Dawg Sports (Georgia)
ESPN: Ivan Maisel/Pat Forde
Every Day Should Be Saturday (Florida)
FOX: Pete Fiutak
Golden Tornado (Georgia Tech)
Heisman Pundit
I'm a Realist (Georgia)
Journalism is for Rock Stars (Alabama)
Mark May Be Wrong
MDG CFB (Fresno State)
Mountain Lair (West Virginia)
MGOBlog (Michigan)
Orange::44 (Syracuse)
Paradigm Blog (Michigan)
Paul Westerdawg (Georgia)
Pitch Right (Navy)
Rammer Jammer Yellow Hammer (Alabammer)
Section Six
Sexy Results (Virginia)
SI: Stewart Mandel/John Walters
Sporting Fools (Florida State)
Straight Bangin' (Michigan)
Texas A&M and Baseball, In No Particular Order (Texas A&M)
The 614 (Ohio State)
The House That Rock Built (Notre Dame)
The Sporting Gnomes (Clemson)
Tiger Pundit (Clemson)
We Must Ignite This Couch (West Virginia)
The Wizard of Odds

- - - - -
The Blog Poll

- - - - -
WANNA DO SOME RESEARCH? NERD! HERE'S SOME QUICK REFERENCES:

College Football Data Warehouse
College Football Research Center
College Football News
cfbstats.com
Football Commentary
THE STANDINGS
THE POLLS

INDIVIDUAL STATISTICS
Rushing
Passing
Receiving
All-Purpose
Scoring
Tackles
Sacks
Interceptions
Tackles For Loss
Field Goals
Punting
Kickoff Returns
Punt Returns
TEAM STATISTICS
Rushing Offense
Passing Offense
Total Offense
Scoring Offense
Rushing Defense
Passing Defense
Total Defense
Scoring Defense
Turnover Margin

- - - - -
Past Seasons
2005
Thursday Morning Quarterback
Sept. 29/Oct. 6/Oct. 20/Oct. 27/Nov. 3/Nov. 10/Nov. 17/Nov. 24/Dec. 1
Sunday Morning Quarterback
Oct. 2/Oct. 23/Oct. 30/Nov. 6/Nov. 13/Nov. 27
Stat Relevance Watch
Part One/Part Two/Part Three
SMQ Bowl Blitz
New Orleans/GMAC/Las Vegas/Poinsettia/Motor City

SMQ's [Hurricane-Abbreviated] 2005 Preview
Top 25 Countdown/Methodology
All-America Team
ACC
BIG EAST
BIG TEN
BIG XII